Vincent Bugliosi
Vincent Bugliosi
Vincent T. Bugliosi, Jr.was an American attorney and New York Times bestselling author. During his eight years in the Los Angeles County district attorney's office, he successfully prosecuted 105 out of 106 felony jury trials, which included 21 murder convictions without a single loss. He was best known for prosecuting Charles Manson and other defendants accused of the seven Tate–LaBianca murders of August 9–10, 1969. Although Manson did not physically participate in the murders at Sharon Tate's home, Bugliosi used...
NationalityAmerican
ProfessionNon-Fiction Author
Date of Birth18 August 1934
CountryUnited States of America
So I don't blame Boies for the decision of the Court at all.
No matter what I do, I'll be forever known as the Manson prosecutor.
Just like I'm still angry with Simpson for getting by with two murders.
I, for one, can't be sure at all there is a God.
I'm still angry with Simpson for getting by with two murders.
I believe that the question of the existence of God is an impenetrable mystery and beyond human comprehension.
For the life of me, I still don't understand why humans pray.
There is no question at all that Manson was sending Tex, Sadie, Katie, and Linda out on his mission of murder.
I'm trying to finish my book on the Kennedy assassination.
Yeah, I lost court cases and misdemeanor juries, but of felony jury trials I was successful 105 of 106 times.
It was OK for the media to pursue Former President Clinton year after year for lying about a private, consensual sexual affair, but we have five justices who committed one of the biggest crimes in American History, and it ceased to be a big story.
And I think within the pages of The Betrayal of America I think I present an overwhelming case that these five justices were up to no good, and they deliberately set out to hand the election to George Bush.
We can know that the Christian God cannot exist. If he is all-powerful and all-good, as Christians maintain, there would not have been, for instance, the Holocaust. This is an inherent self-contradiction. So if Christians insist on having a God, they can do so, but if they have any respect for logic they'll have to redefine who he is.
If it's a close election, then it's better for the Supreme Court to pick the president, whether or not he won the election. It's just insane on its face.