Robert Bork
Robert Bork
Robert Heron Borkwas an American legal scholar who advocated the judicial philosophy of originalism. Bork served as a Yale Law School professor, Solicitor General, Acting Attorney General, and a judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit...
NationalityAmerican
ProfessionPolitician
Date of Birth1 March 1927
CityPittsburgh, PA
CountryUnited States of America
argument basic clear confirm judicial lacks nominee persuasive philosophy skills visible
confirm a nominee with no visible judicial philosophy who lacks the basic skills of persuasive argument and clear writing.
everybody talked
Everybody else I've talked to ranges between disapproval and outrage.
attest candor importance vital
attest to the vital importance of candor and confidentiality in the solicitor general's decision-making process.
benefit consumers multiple sources
Consumers will benefit from multiple sources of innovation,
law letter percent professors sign
Only 1.5 Percent of Law Professors Sign Letter Opposing Roberts.
creating guess rights
My guess would be he will not participate in creating new constitutional rights
actual asserted bill high judicial number original philosophy rights understanding
Without adherence to the original understanding, even the actual Bill of Rights could be pared or eliminated. It is asserted nonetheless, and sometimes on high authority, that the judicial philosophy of original understanding is fatally defective in any number of respects.
sympathy
We all have to have some sympathy for her.
country existed opposition reflected
The opposition reflected the polarization that existed in this country.
begin court develop late philosophy work
It's a little late to develop a constitutional philosophy or begin to work it out when you're on the court already,
confirmed happen hearings john roberts time wisdom
The conventional wisdom right now is that John Roberts will be confirmed just as the conventional wisdom in 1987 going into the hearings was that Robert Bork would be confirmed, ... You never know what's going to happen at a hearing. I think that's been demonstrated time and again.
begins sure
This begins to demystify the presidency, and I'm not sure that's all bad.
advocate judicial powerful prominent
the most prominent and intellectually powerful advocate of judicial restraint.
absolute attempts branch court disdain domestic government guidance historic justices lack minimal moral name original powerful principles rules task truly understanding whether
Once the justices depart, as most of them have, from the original understanding of the principles of the Constitution, they lack any guidance other than their own attempts at moral philosophy, a task for which they have not even minimal skills. Yet when it rules in the name of the Constitution, whether it rules truly or not, the Court is the most powerful branch of government in domestic policy. The combination of absolute power, disdain for the historic Constitution, and philosophical incompetence is lethal.