Jonathan Todd
Jonathan Todd
commission computer expert leading microsoft name professor suggested whose
Professor Barrett is a leading and well-respected computer expert whose name was suggested to the Commission by Microsoft .
expecting microsoft opinion reply statement
We are of the opinion that Microsoft is not in compliance. We are still expecting a reply to our statement of objections.
comply march microsoft
Microsoft has to comply with the March 2004 decision, not with their interpretation of the March 2004 decision.
asked microsoft
Microsoft asked us what could be problematic with Vista, so we told them.
explain march microsoft opportunity relevant support technical
Microsoft will have the opportunity to explain how this technical support is relevant to the March 2004 decision.
business microsoft secrets
Microsoft is very attached, as you know, to business secrets -- its own business secrets.
changing comply imposed microsoft moving obliged remedies
Microsoft is obliged to comply with the remedies which were imposed in the commission's 2004 decision, nothing more nothing less. We are not moving the goalposts as has been suggested, we are not changing our demands.
accurate allow complete full information interface microsoft pcs receive windows
Microsoft is not disclosing complete and accurate interface information to allow non-Microsoft workgroup servers to receive full interoperability with Windows PCs and servers.
eight microsoft period reply short statement sufficient time took view weeks
She took the view that a time period of eight weeks should be sufficient for Microsoft to reply to a comparatively short statement of objections.
changing comply goal imposed march microsoft moving obliged position remedies
Let me be clear, the Commission's position is that Microsoft is obliged to comply with the remedies imposed by the Commission's March 2004 decision, nothing more, nothing less. We are not moving goal posts, we are not changing our demands.
comply course decision expect last march microsoft obviously preferred quickly stress time year
We would have preferred obviously that Microsoft complied quickly as they indicated this time last year that they would. I would like to stress that we expect of course Microsoft to comply with the March 2004 decision and not with their own interpretation of the March 2004 decision.
basis confirmed deadline eight february microsoft nearly reply short statement sufficient weeks
We have confirmed the deadline of February 15 on the basis that nearly eight weeks should be sufficient for Microsoft to reply to a comparatively short statement of objections.
actions assume commission heart interest launch law microsoft product various wants worry
We assume Microsoft has its own interest at heart and it wants to launch another product without having to worry about the Commission instituting various actions under antitrust law because of this product.
asking beyond decision march microsoft necessary quite sufficient supposed
It's not necessary for Microsoft to go beyond what we are asking for. It would be quite sufficient for them to do what they are supposed to do in accordance with the decision of March 2004.