Jonathan Todd
Jonathan Todd
comply course decision expect last march microsoft obviously preferred quickly stress time year
We would have preferred obviously that Microsoft complied quickly as they indicated this time last year that they would. I would like to stress that we expect of course Microsoft to comply with the March 2004 decision and not with their own interpretation of the March 2004 decision.
actions assume commission heart interest launch law microsoft product various wants worry
We assume Microsoft has its own interest at heart and it wants to launch another product without having to worry about the Commission instituting various actions under antitrust law because of this product.
expecting microsoft opinion reply statement
We are of the opinion that Microsoft is not in compliance. We are still expecting a reply to our statement of objections.
basis confirmed deadline eight february microsoft nearly reply short statement sufficient weeks
We have confirmed the deadline of February 15 on the basis that nearly eight weeks should be sufficient for Microsoft to reply to a comparatively short statement of objections.
eight microsoft period reply short statement sufficient time took view weeks
She took the view that a time period of eight weeks should be sufficient for Microsoft to reply to a comparatively short statement of objections.
changing comply goal imposed march microsoft moving obliged position remedies
Let me be clear, the Commission's position is that Microsoft is obliged to comply with the remedies imposed by the Commission's March 2004 decision, nothing more, nothing less. We are not moving goal posts, we are not changing our demands.
engineers improve microsoft plan presented professor proposed work
The only plan professor Barrett has presented was in January, when he proposed that he work with Microsoft engineers to improve the documentation.
available bring code compliance microsoft precisely reply source statement
The onus is on Microsoft to explain, in its reply to the statement of objections today, precisely why and how making the source code available would bring it into compliance with the remedy.
comply confirmed court imposed instance march microsoft remedies since year
It is now one year since the Court of First Instance confirmed that Microsoft had to comply with the remedies imposed by the March 2004 decision.
commission comply confirmed court failed instance march microsoft prefer regrets since year
It is one year since the Court of First Instance confirmed Microsoft had to comply with the March 2004 decision. The Commission regrets Microsoft has failed to do so. We would prefer Microsoft to comply with the March 2004 decision, and not with their interpretation of that decision.
believe decision final microsoft offer reason respect
We have no reason to believe that they will not make final offer before midnight. We have no reason to believe that Microsoft will not respect the decision made in 2004.
comply march microsoft
Microsoft has to comply with the March 2004 decision, not with their interpretation of the March 2004 decision.
asked microsoft
Microsoft asked us what could be problematic with Vista, so we told them.
explain march microsoft opportunity relevant support technical
Microsoft will have the opportunity to explain how this technical support is relevant to the March 2004 decision.