Charles Ruff
Charles Ruff
Charles Frederick Carson "Chuck" Ruffwas a prominent American lawyer based in Washington, D.C., and was best known as the White House Counsel who defended President Bill Clinton during his impeachment trial in 1999...
against began brought charges clinton commit guilty jefferson last william words
Our last words to you, which are the words I began with: William Jefferson Clinton is not guilty of the charges that have been brought against him, he did not commit perjury, he did not commit obstruction of justice, he must not be removed from office,
appear believe branches constitution course embodied executive followed given hearings president relationship special
Give the course that these hearings have followed ... and given the special relationship between the legislative and executive branches embodied in our Constitution and our nation's history, we do not believe that it would be appropriate for the president to appear before the committee,
admitted answer critical launch process serious single system
Having admitted that he did wrong, there's still the critical question, 'Do we want to launch the single most serious constitutional process that our system contemplates?' And the answer to that, in my view, is no.
alleged civil deprive distress elements emotional endure evidence expected ferguson herself hostile issues motions nature presented president prove quo reasonable relevance severe sexual suffered victim whatever whether work
Whatever relevance such evidence may have to prove other elements of plaintiff's case, it does not have anything to do with the issues presented by the president's and Ferguson's motions for summary judgment. I.e., whether plaintiff herself was the victim of alleged quid pro quo or a hostile work environment, sexual harassment, whether the president and Ferguson conspired to deprive her of her civil rights, or whether she suffered emotional distress so severe in nature that no reasonable person could be expected to endure it.
basis beginning report whatever
Whatever is in that report ... there is no basis for beginning an impeachment proceeding.
among both executive including president protected senior
that conversations both with the President and among senior advisors, including the First Lady, are protected by executive privilege.
across agreement capacity conversation country fly held imagine immunity lewinsky majesty might office people side using violation witness
Can you imagine what that little conversation is going to look like, held in the independent counsel's office, with the people there who have the capacity to put Ms. Lewinsky in jail? ... Can we really say that it's just normal, just OK, to have one side using the might and majesty of the independent counsel's office threatening a witness with violation of an immunity agreement if she doesn't fly across the country for this little chat? I think not.
beach case constitution country father fight fought omaha senator side
But I do know this: My father was on Omaha Beach 55 years ago. If you want to know how he would feel if he were here today, he wouldn't fight -- no one fought for one side of this case or the other. He fought as all those did for our country and our Constitution. And as long as each of us -- manager, president's counsel, senator -- does his or her constitutional duty, those who fought for their country will be proud,
fine point
Not to put too fine a point on it, but that's nonsense,
anyone arguing asked continue encouraged face fact force help hurdle hypothesis managers neither nor president rely repeated seemingly somehow
In the face of the seemingly insurmountable hurdle of Ms. Lewinsky's repeated denials that anyone ever asked or encouraged her to lie, the managers have persisted in arguing and continue to do so that the president did somehow encourage her to lie, even if she didn't know it, ... But neither the fact on which they rely nor their hypothesis was of much help to the managers before Ms. Lewinsky's deposition, and neither, surely, has any force after her deposition.
advocate calls case centuries certain images preserve respond sacrificed side themselves
I'm never certain how to respond when an advocate on the other side of a case calls up images of patriots over the centuries who have sacrificed themselves to preserve our democracy,
answered failure question speaks thousand
And Mr. Ruff could have answered that question directly. He did not and his failure to do so speaks a thousand words.
conflicts explaining last managers resolve spent supposed time week witnesses
The (House) managers spent much of their time last week explaining to you why, if only witnesses could be called, you would be able to resolve all of the supposed conflicts in the evidence,