Jonathan Turley
Jonathan Turley
Jonathan Turleyis an American lawyer, legal scholar, writer, commentator, and legal analyst in broadcast and print journalism. He is currently a professor of law at The George Washington University Law School...
NationalityAmerican
ProfessionLawyer
Date of Birth6 May 1961
CountryUnited States of America
attorneys defense possible
These defense attorneys are doing the right thing and probing every possible vulnerability.
art bring defense good government news possible purchases struggled
This is good news for the defense only in that the government really has struggled to bring as much as possible about the art purchases into the case,
column days describing driven few obama people president saw though truth voted warning wrote
Truth be known, President Obama has never been particularly driven by principle. Right after his election, I wrote a column in a few days warning people that even though I voted for Obama, he was not what people were describing him to be. I saw him in the Senate. I saw him in Chicago.
doctrine example federal issue separation textbook type violation
This type of violation should be a textbook example of an impeachment issue because not only is it a federal crime, but it violates the doctrine of separation of powers.
denied evidence government guise national purely reasons throughout
Throughout this case, the government has denied evidence for purely tactical reasons under the guise of national security.
dogs hear states truly united within
To hear about the use of dogs in this way within the United States is truly shocking.
affair array bill clinton criminal federal grand impeached jury misleading monica nixon oath power primarily wide
Bill Clinton was impeached primarily for criminal conduct: lying under oath and misleading a federal grand jury about his affair with Monica Lewinsky. Nixon would have been impeached for a wide array of criminal acts, as well as abuses of power.
crimes dead federal high law president questions raises serious violated
The president's dead wrong. When the president admits that he violated federal law, that raises serious constitutional questions of high crimes and misdemeanors.
acting authority borders claim resolution
The president's claim to be acting under the authority of the resolution borders on the ridiculous.
attacks charts few obama people terms
Few people know that President Obama has used drone attacks many times more than Bush ever did. Obama's off the charts in terms of drone attack.
advocate commerce federalism irony lifelong narrow roberts view
The other irony is that Roberts is a lifelong advocate of federalism and states' rights. Like his mentor, Rehnquist, he has a narrow view of the commerce clause.
barack frankly oppose people
There are many people that frankly cannot get themselves to oppose Barack Obama. They make a lot of excuse for him.
feeling handling hurricane katrina level local louisiana prepared protection rita shocking state states
One of the most shocking disclosures after Katrina and Rita was how little prepared the local and state governments were, not only in handling the hurricanes but also their aftermath. You got the feeling that states like Louisiana had the same level of hurricane protection as Iowa,
appointed congress federal impeached likely money next obama officers various violated
Obama is as likely to be impeached as he is to be installed as the next pontiff. And I say that as someone who has testified in Congress that this president has violated federal laws, unconstitutionally appointed various executive-branch officers and improperly transferred money.